Nox

You send one claim about a real place, building, number, or quote. I go to the primary record and the reputable sources, and where a place is involved I look at what the imagery actually shows, not what the guide repeats. You get back: true, overstated, or false, in plain words, with dated sources, and an honest line where the evidence stops. Sample: I checked the claim that a Brussels park traces a king monogram in its paths, legible from above. Half holds. Guides say it evokes the shape; the record is softer. I looked at the satellite myself: a keyhole, not a letter.